London Elections 24 April 2012

The left does not have to hold its nose and vote for Ken – Ashdown

I understand why many voters on the progressive wing of politics are struggling with voting for Ken Livingstone.

His campaign been sad, bad, desperate and divisive.

He has just one big idea – a 7% cut in tube fares. A perfectly decent policy at a time when fares have risen remorselessly for years on end, but the problem is he can’t do it and he knows it.

TfL knows it too, having worked out that if they implemented such a cut the money would run out and in three years time your fares would have to be hiked up by an eye-watering 38% on top of inflation.

Ken’s been around a long time, He’s done some good things in the past and and he’s learned a trick or two along the way. One is how to play “dog whistle” politics – sending out subliminal messages which most people can’t hear, but calls in the people you want to hear.

Ken Livingstone knows exactly what he is doing when he describes the Conservative Party as ‘riddled’ with homosexuals. He knows what he is doing when he connects Judaism and wealth.

I do not believe for a second that Ken Livingstone is an anti-Semite or a homophobe – he has a proud record of fighting for gay rights – but he knows what gallery he is playing to.

Some people say this is disreputable. Perhaps it is. But its certainly sad, bad, desperate and divisive. Londoners deserve better and voters proud of their progressive credentials are right to think twice about backing him. And that’s without even going into the row about his personal tax arrangements.

You must not interpret this as an endorsement of Boris Johnson. These might be the heady days of coalition but I cannot and will not ever recommend voting for a Conservative.

I believe the people of London are fed up with choosing between Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson. I believe the appetite is there for change and the opportunity is there for a credible, progressive candidate like Brian Paddick to win.

Whether you share my view or not, this election presents you with an opportunity to make a positive choice, not just to cast a vote for the lesser of two evils.

Last May, many of you will have voted in favour of using the alternative vote system. It is a form of this system that we use to elect your Mayor.

You can cast your first vote positively for the person you would most like to see in charge of London. If that person does not receive enough support then your second preference vote will count instead.

If you want to prevent Boris Johnson winning you can vote against him twice, with both your heart and your head.

And if the thought of backing Ken Livingstone and his brand of opportunistic and divisive politics leaves you cold, you can cast your first preference vote for Brian Paddick instead.

In Brian Paddick we have a liberal progressive of the utmost integrity who has dedicated his life to public service and bringing Londoners together.

From social house building and targeting fare cuts on the low paid to tackling racism in the police and giving young people a positive alternative to gangs, he has the ideas to bring some social justice to the capital.

Those of you who consider yourself on the left do not have to hold your nose and vote for Ken. Not when Brian Paddick offers such a positive alternative.

 

 

Liberator article 2 Dec 2013

LIBERATOR ARTICLE – WINNING HEARTS AS WELL AS MINDS

I have never really been a numbers man. If I had been, I may have had second thoughts about taking leadership of our party with our polling remained stubbornly around the asterisk mark.

In fact I may have had second thoughts long before that, when in in 1976 I was first selected for Yeovil only to find the party getting beaten at the ballot box by the National Front.

I have never been a numbers man for a simple reason: I am not the sort of politician who dreams of being an accountant.

That’s not to say that accountants do not have their place in parliament; frankly a few more on the Labour Party benches during the last government may have saved us from some of the mess we’re now having to clean up.

But while I doff my cap to this breed of politician and will always bask in their brainpower, concentrating on the numbers has never really been my style.

Which, you may well think, might make co-ordinating a General Election campaign a little tricky.

To which I would reply: “With numbers like ours, frankly it helps!”

Clearly, I jest – as, indeed a man of my considerable years is entitled to do. But within this there is a kernel of truth. For instead of being a numbers man, I am a hearts-and-minds man. I see the role of politicians not just to scrutinise but to lead. And the role of a leader is to pioneer, persuade, enthuse and cajole.

I enjoyed this part of my job that during my time as captain of our ship. And that’s how I see my role now that I’m back down in the engine room, stoking the fire.

So, guess who in this rather tortured analogy are the flames?

Yup, that’d be our members. They are the bright light that heats this party, the furnace of activity that powers our ideas, the flames that will singe our opponents if they venture too close.

Ok, ok, enough of that.

The General Election campaign will feature numbers, of course it will. The number of jobs created under this government especially apprenticeships. The amount of pupil premium funding awarded to each school. The proportion of people we will take out of income tax in your constituency and so on. These are all hugely important figures that we will all need to learn by rote as the campaign approaches (though there’s no time like the present…)

I am sure that, true to form, our manifesto numbers will shine, the sums will add up and confound the critics with the simple purity of both its liberalism and practical common sense. Described begrudgingly in 2010 by the IFS as the “least worst” of the three main parties our numbers are often right.

But numbers alone will not be enough come 2015. We live in a deeply cynical age where anything a politician says will be taken with a big dollop of cynicism by a sceptical electorate. We’re just not getting the benefit of the doubt any more. Pure statistics run the risk of hitting an impenetrable wall of doubt and distrust. Even the most finely-crafted arrow cannot pierce that kind of granite.

So I see it very much my role to make certain our campaign speaks directly to people in a way that does penetrate those defences. It is to make sure that we take each of our achievements and policies and craft a narrative that explains how each helps reach our fundamental goals: creating a society that is fairer, freer; much less conformative and much much more meritocratic.

That is why when our team crafted the central message that we will fight the next election on the argument that the Liberal Democrats will create a stronger economy and a fairer society, I insisted we added a third prong: enabling everyone to get on in life – that means empowering them and giving them the freedom to live their lives as they want, not as conformity demands

And it’s why you can be sure we’ll always strive to run a campaign with heart and passion which will both unite our activists and inspire the voters.

We must never forget what makes us a unique political force. In my opinion it is summed up in that one little verb, to enable.

Our mission in 2015, as it is in every election, is to set out onto the doorsteps of Britain and explain why we are the only party that will harness the powers of the state to set the individual free. Why we are the only party that will hammer away at monopolies that shackle us all, whether they be in the private or public sphere. And why we are the only party that embodies the spirit of Gladstone through a humanitarian interventionist outlook that keeps the world safe.

This is what inspires our activists to go out in all weather to win us elections. This is what brings people into the party so young and so passionate, and keeps them with us for life. And it is this central tenet that will inspire activists to keep working all the way up to 2015 and beyond.

I have said many times that I believe history will show Nick Clegg is, bby some margin, the best poltical leader of our day. But whether it is Nick on the front of leaflets, or Ming, Charles or myself, we are merely there as glorified cyphers. It is the people delivering those leaflets, and conversing on the doorstep, who are distilling the very essence of liberal democracy. And it’s that key message of liberalism – enabling, empowering liberalism – which will stay with voters long after the statistics have left their minds.

However, if you think this is me giving you permission to trash the coalition’s record or pretend we have not been part of government over the last five years when on the doorstep, it is most emphatically not.

We will be judged on how we have governed. It will be absolutely fundamental to how most people decide their vote. We cannot hope that a strong record of local action and a passionate declamation of liberalism will be enough to push us first over the finish line.

So my challenge to you, no matter how fed up you may be about some of the actions of this government, is to think hard about how our party has married our long-cherished belief in enabling citizens to the realities of governing in both a coalition and in an economic downturn.

Because if you cannot speak passionately and eloquently about what we have achieved in difficult circumstances – and more importantly, why we have achieved it – it will make it very difficult to persuade the average voter to put a cross next to the bird in 2015. Starting a doorstep conversation with an apology for being a Liberal Democrat will rarely win a floating voter over. Put simply, if you cannot convince yourselves of the merits of having our party in government, you will not be able to convince others.

The good news is, we’re here to help. Nick has made a series of important speeches in recent months where he has set out how his philosophy of liberalism has transferred into government. And the policy unit in headquarters has both distilled our many achievements into a handy pocket-sized booklet and secured data that shows how many people we’ve helped in each individual constituency.

So how would you look a voter in the face and defend health reforms, for example? For a start there’s the shield: Labour started these reforms and signed disastrous PFI deals that we’ll be paying back for generations; while the Tories are ideologically in-hoc to privatising healthcare and probably would have succeeded in doing so without us in government stopping them. Then there’s the stick: not only have the Liberal Democrats made certain there are now 4,000 more doctors in the NHS than under Labour but we have ensured that, in the new system, not only is there more integration of services but also that patients have a more personalised system and more democratic oversight – making healthcare work better both for the community and the individual.

Secondly, welfare reform. There is a truly liberal case to be made for changing a system that traps people in poverty, as Labour managed, by ensuring those with families would lose money if they took a job. Our changes to the income tax threshold, extra help with childcare and free school meals for infants all help give people on benefits the freedom to go into work. And what about the other parties? Labour, let’s not forget, introduced disability tests for those on welfare which we have improved – and Labour pioneered the ‘bedroom tax’. And what would the Tories do on their own? Cap child benefit at two children, stop housing benefit for the under 25s and talk relentlessly about the so-called “scroungers” in society. Many Conservatives look forward to the day they are unleashed from the Liberal Democrats not realising they would be held captive once again, this time by the likes of Burkah Banning Peter Bone MP.

Labour will want to talk about jobs. They mustn’t be allowed to get away with it. No Party in Government in recent years has plunged more people into popverty or destroyed more jobs and businesses than Labour did when they trashed our economy and plunged us all into a sea of debt during the last Government

This election is going to be the toughest fight of our lives. We will be asked searching questions and we won’t be able to rely on a lack of scrutiny to dig us out of a hole. Regrettably, thanks to our cynical and unimaginative national media, everything will be seen through a prism of Liberal Democrat MPs being sent like lambs to the slaughter. I suspect a regular question we’ll get asked both on television and on the doorstep will be ‘why should anyone vote for you when your party is going to be annihilated.’ When you think about it not much of a change from the regular question before 2010 ‘why should anyone vote for you when you are never going to be in power.’

Nothing angers me more than this lazy and sneering cynicism. It does all of us a huge disservice – we have all given our time and energy, and often many other resources, to achieving a more liberal Britain for the benefit of all of society. No one should feel anything but pride when they knock on a door with a yellow rosette pinned to their chest.

But it also isn’t true. Because of the hard work of activists over many years, we have now earned the right in communities across Britain to be listened to with an open mind. They have ensured that doors will not be slammed in our faces; that people will hear us out. What it doesn’t do is guarantee us the benefit of the doubt. It doesn’t automatically transfer people into our column, even if they have voted Liberal Democrat many times previously. But it does mean that they will be willing to hear what we have achieved for them and their families; what our vision for a more liberal society entails and why we deserve to have their vote propel us back into government.

We must seize this opportunity. We must each be able to mould our achievements, our ambitions and our vision for liberalism into a simple doorstep pitch we can explain with positivity, pride and panache.

Others have the job of making the numbers add up. Mine is the easy bit – to ensure we run a campaign with heart, soul and vigour; a campaign that inspires our members, the voters, and maybe even the cynical media too. I have a first class team to work with and a great tribe of activists relishing the fight. I could not ask for more. It’s time to stoke that fire. It’s time to get out campaigning again for what we have done in this Government, what we will do in the next and what Liberalism means in the modern age.

The Lib Dem Conference The Guardian 31 August 2012

 

 

 

 

The dews are heavier in the garden, the mists gather in the valleys and there is a morning freshness which tells us the sad news that summer is passing.

 

Even if we were blind to nature’s signs, we would know it to be so from the newspapers and commentators. The August silly season stories (my favourite this year was a news item about wireless transmitters being installed on hairy ants from Yorkshire) gives way as it always does, to the press’s September pre-conference bombardments on the political Parties and their leaders.

 

Every party dissident, minor or not, suddenly finds themselves welcome on every front page and and in every news studio. Opinion pollsters, out of business during the dead days of summer, suddenly find themselves able to use a late August poll to predict the outcome of an election still three years away. I remember one in 1995, two from the election in which the Lib Dems doubled their seats, which had me losing my seat in Yeovil. Charles Kennedy was told the same in 2001, two years before he led us to our greatest ever score of elected MPs.

 

Even the normally scrupulous Martin Kettle, writing in yesterday’s Guardian, preferred to suggest Armageddon for us in the next election using a mid-holiday poll showing us at 10%, rather than Tuesday’s poll in his own newspaper giving us 15%; no comment on the fact that this was precisely inline with our average between 1997 and 2001, before returning 52 seats in Parliament. When you have a point to make, any fact will do.

 

Liberal Democrats have long ago learned to ignore the polls and get on with the job in hand. I should know. I am the only political leader in modern British History who has presided over an opinion poll rating represented by an asterisk – denoting that no detectable support could be found for us anywhere in the land!

 

We will be judged at the next election by one fact and one fact only. Whether we have had the mettle to stay the course in delivering effective Government for our country at a time of crisis. That is the only thing that matters. All the rest is the froth.

 

History has not dealt us the easiest of hands.

 

It does not help that we are trying to prove that coalition Government works in such difficult circumstances. Or that those with whom we have to work are not (to say the least) natural bedfellows. These things make life more difficult. But they do not lessen the need to see it through – or the consequences for us if we fail to do so.

 

We face an existential choice both for our country and our Party.

 

Britain is confornting the severest economic crisis for half a century at a time when everyone else is in crisis too. When our major trading partners in Europe are facing economic melt-down. When the traditional foundations of wealth and how we make our way in the world are changing. When conflict and instability seem a growing contagion. And when the whole structure of world power is changing. In these circumstances who can be surprised that the attractions of easy solutions are more seductive than tough ones; or that popularity is hard to come by.

 

As it is for our country, so also for our Party.

 

When we all overwhelmingly supported Nick Clegg’s decision to lead us into Government we knew it would be difficult. We also knew that we were embarked on a course which would change our Party as well as our country. Nick challenged us to leave our comfort zone and make the change from a Party of perpetual opposition, to one capable of carrying the burdens of Government. Without Nick, that decision would never have been made and the historic opportunity to show who we really are, would never have existed. It is the job of our Leader to take us into Government. I failed; Nick Clegg has succeeded.

In my view he has led our Party in Government, not flawlessly of course, but with a skill no-one else in British politics could have matched and a grace under fire which should make us proud. If you want to see how successful he has been, just listen to the complaints from the Tory right.

 

Of course, now there are plenty of easier courses on offer. In tough times there are always petty ambitions to be aired, the kind suggestions of our enemies to be ignored to and helpful comments from the sidelines to be endured.

 

But there are mighty things to be done in the next year. Getting growth out of hard times; ensuring that even in austerity, Britain can remain a fair society; limiting the powers of the state to snoop into our lives; protecting our fundamental rights from attack in the name of security; asserting our independence as we run up to the next election and preparing the way for the partnerships and polices which will be necessary afterwards.

 

None of this will be achieved by being distracted by mid term summer polls, passing newspaper comments, or short term personal manoeuvring. The right thing for Liberal Democrats to do now is to continue to do what we have done so well so far. Concentrate on the job we set our hands to under Nicks leadership. Nothing else.

 

903

 

Lib Dems – 20th anniversary 29 Sep 2012

 

 

Lib Dems – 20th anniversary

 

It is said that the four most stressful events in a person’s life are marriage, divorce, a death in the family and moving house. When our new Party was founded we did all four. Our old Parties, the Liberals and the SDP died, as we united in the Lib Dems (or the Social and Liberal Democrats as we were then called), we had to divorce ourselves from those old colleagues who didn’t want to come with us and we move to a new home in Cowley Street.

 

It was not easy. Indeed, as the founding Leader of the new Party, there were many times when I though we wouldn’t make it. We had no money – the Inland Revenue Inspectors actually came to close us down for unpaid National Insurance, just hours before I was announced as the the Party’s first Leader on the steps of Cowley Street. Our membership was plummeting. Our opinion poll ratings were in low singe figures (they were soon to go lower still – I am the only Party Leader in Britain who has presided over an asterisk, signifying that the Party was within the margin of error of nothing in the Polls). And we were in a do or die fight with David Owen’s continuing SDP for our very existence. The overwhelming consensus opinion of commentators of the time was that we were done for.

 

They reminded us, I well recall, that there had been many attempts to set up new Parties in Britain, but none had survived since the founding of Labour – and we were about to go the same way.

 

But we did survive. And then we grew. And now we have become the strongest third Party in Britain for only a handful of years short of a century. And there is a reason for that. In fact there are many. Our members believed in the Lib Dems even when others didn’t and in the end that enabled us to begin winning again – starting at local level, but soon clocking up great by-election victories, beginning with Eastbourne.

 

Secondly, there was a space for us. Liberalism is the only political philosophy which makes any sense of the world in which we now live – it combines the internationalism we need if we are to solve our global problems and a belief in individual liberty and power which lies at the heart of this age of new technologies.

 

And lastly the public wanted us as an alternative to the tired old, corrupt old, failed old choices offered by Tory and Labour.

 

I often think that, at our best, we Lib Dems combine all the best of our two old parent Parties. The dedication to grass roots politics, the radicalism and the sheer bloody minded determination of the old Liberals. And the modernity, intellectual rigour and understanding of modern economics of the old SDP.

 

I am confident it remains a winning combination, clear that our rise and rise from those early days of near disaster can and will continue and certain that our country’s politics is better, safer and much more democratic because of the decision we took to risk all, come together and found the Lib Dems 20 years ago.

 

525 words

The Leaders Debate The Daily Mirror – 5 March 2015

The Leaders Debate The Daily Mirror – 5 March 2015

 

Paddy – Mirror Op-ed – 450 words

 

Back when he was Leader of the Opposition David Cameron goaded Gordon Brown for being frightened of live television debates.

 

He shouted across from the Dispatch Box in the House of Commons, jabbed his finger in the Prime Minister’s direction and accused him of running scared.

 

But there is only one party running scared of these debates now – the Conservative Party. And there is only one man running scared – David Cameron.

 

By wriggling, ducking and slipping out of every proposal put forward by the broadcasters, the Prime Minister has shown his true colours.

 

In the words of his great idol Margaret Thatcher – he is too “frit” to defend his own record.

 

Despite what the Conservatives might say, these debates breathed new life into politics five years ago, with 22 million of us tuning in to watch them. We should not allow them to be killed off in the interest of one man and one party.

 

David Cameron sang their praises when they were in his favour but now he bullies the press and hides behind his office in Downing Street. This is simply unacceptable.

 

These debates do not belong to the Prime Minister or the Tories, they belong to the British people.

 

So let me be clear. If David Cameron will not defend his part in this government then Nick Clegg, is more than happy to defend ours. He has already written to Ed Miliband proposing this.

 

This is because Liberal Democrats believe in debate, we are proud of our record in Government and we have fought every step of the way to cement these debates in the political calendar.

 

We are proud that in Coalition we lifted the country out of recession, cut taxes for working people, created two million apprentices and stopped the Tories trampling on our civil liberties.

 

What’s more, David Cameron is not only proposing a ludicrous, seven-sided, bite-sized squabble fest of a debate but has say it must take place before the Conservative manifesto is published.

 

This means he avoids being grilled on his party’s plans for Britain. I’m not surprised for they show every sign of being truly frightening.

 

The Tories have put on us notice, they intend to return to the nasty party unless the Liberal Democrats are there to constrain them.

 

David Cameron and the Tories might not want these debates to happen but the public, the Liberal Democrats and the broadcasters do.

 

It is time for the Prime Minister to ditch the excuses and stop playing politics with these debates – if he does not then history will judge him as he judged Gordon Brown – frit.

 

Paddy Ashdown is the Chair of the Liberal Democrat General Election Campaign

Being a Lib Dem 29 Oct 2012

A Liberal Democrat is not somebody who looks for the easy ride to success.

 

The very roots of this party come from the belief that there is better and fairer way to run this country – one not based on a discredited and undemocratic two-party system. Inevitably, this means challenging those who are only too happy to continue with the status quo and will fight mightily to retain it.

 

The party has had, over the years, many great successes in overturning the expectations of its detractors. We’ve won parliamentary seats against all the odds. Through sheer hard work and dogged determination we have taken control of vast city councils and local authorities all over the UK.

 

In 2020, however, when the country was in a deep economic crisis, the party took an historic leap. It decided, with Nick Clegg at the helm, to go into government.

 

We knew that this would change the party forever. Liberal Democrats would no longer be the party that debated fine policies that never saw the light of day. We had, at last, the opportunity to put those policies into reality.

 

But it wasn’t easy. Pluralist politics – something that liberals feel in their very bones is the right way to govern – means compromise.  And working with the Conservatives – not a natural bedfellow – has demanded courage and resilience, not least by Nick Clegg.

 

There have been huge successes – the Pupil Premium, taking one million people out of paying tax, the Green Deal, (MORE).

 

We are now a credible party of government.  We have made a significant difference – helping to make a fairer and more equal society.  And remember, it would not have happened under the Conservatives.  And it certainly did not happen under Labour.

 

So this Coalition government presents us with the first opportunity in our history to show the electorate exactly what Liberal Democrats can achieve in government.

 

We have two and a half years to prove to the voters that we have both the economic nous and the compassionate desire to make this a stronger and fairer country.

 

We also now have the mechanics to deliver our message. Liberal Democrat HQ has been restructured with the sole aim of making sure the party can coordinate and run a first class campaign in the run up to 2015.

 

These are tough times – I know, I have been there before. But outwitting the pollsters and scaremongers is not new territory for this party.  In the past, we have shown the character needed to dumbfound our critics – and we can do it again.

 

We will not, however, achieve anything by retreating into our comfort zone. Bringing about a more liberal and democratic society is too important a task to sit back and nurse our bruises.

 

We must not allow the time that Liberal Democrats were in government to become just a small interlude in the political history of Britain.

 

I know that Liberal Democrats have the drive and ambition to show how a government can really work for all its citizens. This time we are even better prepared.

 

We must start now and, with your help, we will achieve our aim.

 

 

 

 

The Lib Dems and the Euro Election 2014

Euro Elections 2014

 

“I bring you nought for your comfort,

Yea, nought for your desire.

Save that the sky grows darker yet

And the sea rises higher.”

 

I am writing this before the Euro results are known. But I suspect that many Lib Dems waking this morning will identify with King Alfred’s speech to his ragged army in G.K Chesterton’s epic “The Ballad of the White Horse”.

 

We Lib Dems have endured some sombre post-electoral dawns recently. And this morning is going to be another of them.

 

With the election just a year away, this poses some serious questions for us. I shall come to these later.

 

But they pose questions for the other parties too.

 

With UKIP on the stage, can the Tories ever win a majority on their own again? They may hate coalition, but is it now the best the Tories can hope for? Mr Cameron famously wouldn’t “obsess about Europe” because he knew it was toxic for his party’s unity. But by helping UKIP put a European referendum centre stage, he has now cheerfully taken the viper to his breast. A 2017 European referendum could be as deadly to Tory unity as the 1974 one was to Labour. Listen to the Tory voices calling for an electoral pact with UKIP and you can already hear the distant thunder.

 

True to form, Labour’s answer to their difficulties is an enquiry and another outing for their traditional circular firing squad.

 

Mr Farage of course, is the clear winner in all this. With a clear message, a mostly sure touch and a hot line to the sentiments of a large section of the electorate Mr Farage will never again be underestimated and his Party are entitled to the respect they are due for speaking for a section of the English people (UKIP is a curiously English phenomenon) in a way which the rest of us have failed to do.

 

People are surprised that all the attacks on UKIP either back-fired or bounced off. They shouldn’t be. It was lazy politics to charge Mr Farage with racism (even if many of his messages appealed to those who are). To call UKIP racist is not the point. The real charge is that they are a blast from the past. At a time when Britain is struggling to find its way in a fast changing world, UKIP’s answer is to return to a “better” (but mythical) yesterday.

 

This is the “stop the world, I want to get off Party”. The fact that Mr Farage has persuaded so many voters to want to get off with him, is a tribute to his skill and a damning indictment on the rest of us who have failed to provide convincing answers to an electorate, many of whom are by turns frightened by foreign threats and disgusted at the domestic failures – and worse – of Britain’s establishment and political class.

 

So Mr Farage is entitled to his celebrations – he has earned them. But he would be wise to remember that victories pose questions too. In the over-heated language of post-electoral commentary some have talked of “an earthquake moment” (I wish I had a pound for every time I had heard that before). I am not so sure. This looks to me more like Britain’s “Tea Party moment” than anything else. UKIP seems more a movement, albeit a powerful one, than – yet – a political Party. It is united by only three things; nostalgia for the past, hate of Europe and anger at Westminster. It is easy to ride these three horses to victory in a European Election – much more difficult in a General Election. “I am the leader of the people’s army” makes a good slogan, but a poor manifesto. UKIP is loud when telling us the problem – but silent on proposing solutions acceptable in a civilized country.

 

The question for Mr Farage is now can he unite his polyglot party behind a coherent and attractive plan for the better government of Britain? It is one thing for him to breezily dismiss the manifesto around which his party united in 2010, as rubbish. With its proposals for a 30% flat rate tax, abolishing maternity allowance, introducing health vouchers and legislating for smarter dress in theatres, it manifestly was. But what will he put in its place? Mr Farage pronounces that he wants to “do a Paddy Ashdown” and target a few seats where he could win. But I had a party united around a political philosophy and a programme to go with it. What policies beyond an instinct for dislike, nostalgia and distrust, unite UKIP?

 

So what about us Lib Dems? Well we have challenges aplenty.

 

But the biggest is not to lose our heads.

 

If you think this morning is tough, try the European Elections of 1989. We came last behind the Greens in every constituency in Britain bar one! The press read the funeral orisons over us – just as they will today. But they were wrong. In the General Election which followed we not only re-established ourselves, we laid the foundations for doubling our seats in 1997.

 

The Euro Elections are always tough for us. Did we expect anything different this time? Parties in Government always get a kicking in these elections. Did we think, just because we are Lib Dems, we wouldn’t?

 

It’s not what has happened in all the elections up to now that matters. It’s what happens next. Now is the moment we have been through all this pain for. The moment when, in the context of a General Election, we can take our message to the electorate – a proud message – a message of achievement in Government.

 

Andrew Rawnsley recently wrote of the Lib Dems “For four torrid years, they have displayed a remarkable resilience, an astonishing discipline and an incredible resistance to despair.” Exactly!

 

Now the days of the back foot are over. Tough though it may be this miserable morning, if we keep our nerve and our unity, there is still everything to play for and a great message to campaign on through the summer and autumn and right up to the real election next May.